By Heck, Fabian
Pied-piping, the phenomenon that wh-movement may perhaps aim different types now not marked with the function [wh], has quite often been thought of idiosyncratic and pathological. On Pied-Piping argues that this review isn't really right. The e-book offers a compilation of crosslinguistic generalizations on pied-piping and a idea that derives them. Pied-piping is included right into a derivational concept of successive cyclic wh-movement that comes with input-output optimization, the operation Agree, and section conception. The ensuing thought is a step in the direction of ultimate a long-standing hole in syntactic theorizing.
Read Online or Download On Pied-Piping: Wh-Movement and Beyond PDF
Similar grammar books
Authorised writing kind conventions swap very slowly, yet they do swap. that's all of the extra it is because this favourite reference publication for college kids, writers, and educators calls for periodic updating. during this re-creation, the authors evaluate the basics of right sentence constitution, then current twenty uncomplicated sentence styles that surround almost each powerful approach of writing basic, compound, and complicated sentences.
This quantity includes essays on ellipsis -- the omission of understood phrases from a sentence -- and the heavily similar phenomena of gapping. This quantity provides paintings via top researchers on syntactic, semantic and computational features of ellipsis. The chapters assemble quite a few theoretical views and consider a number of cross-linguistic phenomena regarding ellipsis in jap, Arabic, Hebrew, and in English.
How does strong writing stand out? If its function is to show evidence, findings, or directions, it desire be learn just once for its content material to be transparent. If its goal is to entertain or to impress notion, it makes readers are looking to come again for extra. Revised and up to date, this advisor covers 4 crucial points of fine writing: · person words—spelling adaptations, hyphenation, usually careworn homonyms, usually misused phrases and words, abnormal plurals and negatives, and makes use of of capitalization and kind variety so as to add distinctive meanings· Punctuation—the position of every mark achieve readability and affecting tone, and demonstration of the way misuses may end up in ambiguity· Syntax and structure—agreement of topic and verb, parallel building, modifiers, tenses, pronouns, lively as opposed to passive voice, and extra · Style—advice at the much less hard-and-fast components of readability and tone, together with sentence size and order, conciseness, simplification, analyzing point, jargon and clich?
The articles amassed during this booklet are focused on the problems of restrictiveness and learnability inside of generative grammar, in particular, inside of Chomsky's 'Extended regular Theory'. those concerns were principal to syntactic examine for many years and they're much more important now as effects on syntactic thought, on learnability, and on acquisition start to converge.
- Analyzing the Grammar of English
- CliffsStudySolver English Grammar by Jeff Coghill (2003-06-27)
- The Handbook of Phonological Theory (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics)
- Grammar Can Be Fun
Extra resources for On Pied-Piping: Wh-Movement and Beyond
25. For a more explicit evaluation of Cowper’s system and its problems concerning piedpiping in German, see Lutz and Trissler (1992), Trissler (1999). 26. In some sense then, Cowper envisages an analysis of pied-piping in relative clauses in terms of topicalization, see Emonds (1979), Emonds (1985), and Webelhuth (1992). 4 below. 20 (31) Introduction a. Egbert, [ DP pictures of who ] 2 Horace adores t2 , . . b. *Egbert, [ DP pictures of someone ] 2 Horace adores t2 , . . c. *Egbert, Horace adores [ DP pictures of someone ] 2, .
Such cases are unexpected under an adjacency requirement on subcategorization. 2. Cowper (1987) Cowper (1987) presents a theory of pied-piping that is entirely based on whfeature percolation. It is based on a proposal put forward by di Sciullo and Williams (1987), originally designed to explain feature spreading in morphology (see also Selkirk (1982)) According to this proposal, a non-head α can percolate a feature [ F ] to an immediately dominating constituent β if and only if β is not specified for [ F ].
26 Introduction lation. Accordingly, pied-piping of CP3 should be possible. In order to block pied-piping in (41), Webelhuth suggests that a wh-phrase that has percolated its wh-feature to a dominating node does not bear [ WH ] itself anymore. What is more, he assumes that a wh-phrase that has lost its wh-feature via percolation can no longer bind a variable. It then follows that (41) violates Koopman and Sportiche’s (1982) B IJECTION P RINCIPLE (BP), which states that every variable has to be bound by exactly one operator, and every operator has to bind exactly one variable: if the trace left behind by wh-movement of who in (41) counts as a variable, then who, having percolated its wh-feature, fails to bind this variable.