By Paul Lodge, Tom Stoneham
Locke and Leibniz on Substance gathers jointly papers through a world crew of educational specialists, reading the metaphysical proposal of substance within the writings of those towering philosophers of the early glossy interval. each one of those newly-commissioned essays considers vital interpretative matters about the function that the idea of substance performs within the paintings of Locke and Leibniz, and its intersection with different key concerns, corresponding to own identification. participants additionally contemplate the connection among the 2 philosophers and contemporaries reminiscent of Descartes and Hume.
Read Online or Download Locke and Leibniz on Substance PDF
Best metaphysics books
The Metaphysical Presuppositions of Being-in-the-World brings St. Thomas Aquinas and Martin Heidegger into discussion and argues for the need of Christian philosophy. during the war of words of Heideggerian and Thomist suggestion, it bargains an unique and entire rethinking of the character of temporality and the origins of metaphysical inquiry.
No brief booklet at the clarification of life can manage to pay for the hubris of saying to complete this activity. and definitely no such declare will be or is being made right here. What this booklet makes an attempt is on the very so much a coarse caricature of the conceptual structure that an enough rationalization might be anticipated to convey.
In his try and provide a solution to the query of what constitutes actual wisdom, Kant steers a center path among empiricism and rationalism. actual wisdom refers to a given empirical fact, yet precise wisdom needs to be understood as worthwhile to boot, and so for this reason, has to be a priori.
'What is time? ' recognized thinker and highbrow historian, Eva Brann mounts an inquiry right into a topic universally agreed to be one of the such a lot prevalent and the main unusual of human stories. Brann techniques questions of time throughout the examine of ten recognized texts through such thinkers as Plato, Augustine, Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger, displaying how they convey to gentle the perennial concerns relating to time.
- The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics
- Philosophical Analysis and Human Welfare: Selected Essays and Chapters from Six Decades (Philosophical Studies Series)
- Phenomenal Qualities: Sense, Perception, and Consciousness
- The Theatre of Production: Philosophy and Individuation between Kant and Deleuze (Renewing Philosophy)
- Augenblick: The Concept of the 'Decisive Moment' in 19th- and 20th-Century Western Philosophy (Ashgate New Critical Thinking in Philosophy)
- Whitehead's Radically Different Postmodern Philosophy: An Argument for Its Contemporary Relevance (S U N Y Series in Philosophy)
Additional info for Locke and Leibniz on Substance
Despite the consequent prominence of these sceptical themes, however, Locke’s overall position is very far from negative, and his account of ‘our complex ideas of substances’ sets the scene for an ingenious and subtle epistemology of physical science, whose power has too often been underestimated through failure to appreciate the virtues of his unjustly derided theory of substance. 24 Peter Millican NOTES For helpful comments and discussion on earlier versions of this chapter, which have enabled me substantially to improve it, I am especially grateful to Michael Ayers and Amyas Merivale.
In the Essay Concerning Human Understanding (ECHU). 2). Most significant in this definition are the dual qualifiers that Locke uses: ‘supposed’ and ‘unknown’. This chapter examines this two-qualifier definition, illuminating the historical and philosophical significance it may have. On Locke’s substratum, there have been two rival readings. The first takes it to be a bare substratum (Bennett 1971, 1987); and the second identifies it with what Locke terms as ‘real essence’—that is, ‘a real Constitution of the insensible Parts’—throughout the Essay (Ayers 1975, 1991).
2). 24 Locke’s theory of substance has often been treated with derision, especially by those who have taken it to be concerned with some pseudo-problem about property instantiation. His actual theory is far more reasonable, that when we perceive consistent ‘object-like’ patterns of behaviour in the world—or are conscious of events in our minds—we presume that there is something real and ‘substantial’ lying behind those observed phenomena. Locke has little sympathy for external world scepticism, and his initial focus on sensory ‘Ideas [that] go constantly together’ is best explained in terms of his interest in ‘complex ideas of substances’, rather than any would-be Locke on Substance and Our Ideas of Substances 23 anti-sceptical inference.