By Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
This is often the 1st edited quantity committed particularly to first individual non-singular reference (‘we’). Its objective is to discover the interaction among the grammatical signifies that a language bargains for attaining collective self-reference and the socio-pragmatic – in the main – services of ‘we’. in addition to an advent, which deals an summary of the issues and matters linked to first individual non-singular reference, the quantity includes fifteen chapters that hide languages as varied as, e.g., Dutch, Greek, Hebrew, Cha’palaa and Norf’k, and diverse interactional and genre-specific contexts of spoken and written discourse. It, hence, successfully demonstrates the complexity of collective self-reference and the variety of phenomena that turn into correct while ‘we’ isn't tested in isolation yet in the context of positioned language use. The e-book should be of specific curiosity to researchers engaged on individual deixis and reference, own pronouns, collective identities, etc., yet also will attract linguists whose paintings lies on the interface among grammar and pragmatics, sociolinguistics, discourse and dialog research.
Read or Download Constructing Collectivity: "We" Across Languages and Contexts PDF
Similar grammar books
Permitted writing variety conventions swap very slowly, yet they do swap. that's the entire extra the reason for this is that this favourite reference e-book for college kids, writers, and educators calls for periodic updating. during this re-creation, the authors overview the basics of right sentence constitution, then current twenty easy sentence styles that surround almost each powerful means of writing easy, compound, and complicated sentences.
This quantity includes essays on ellipsis -- the omission of understood phrases from a sentence -- and the heavily comparable phenomena of gapping. This quantity provides paintings by way of major researchers on syntactic, semantic and computational points of ellipsis. The chapters compile numerous theoretical views and think about more than a few cross-linguistic phenomena concerning ellipsis in jap, Arabic, Hebrew, and in English.
How does sturdy writing stand out? If its function is to express evidence, findings, or directions, it desire be learn just once for its content material to be transparent. If its goal is to entertain or to impress notion, it makes readers are looking to come again for extra. Revised and up-to-date, this consultant covers 4 crucial features of excellent writing: · person words—spelling adaptations, hyphenation, usually pressured homonyms, often misused phrases and words, abnormal plurals and negatives, and makes use of of capitalization and kind kind so as to add distinct meanings· Punctuation—the function of every mark in attaining readability and affecting tone, and demonstration of the way misuses can result in ambiguity· Syntax and structure—agreement of topic and verb, parallel building, modifiers, tenses, pronouns, lively as opposed to passive voice, and extra · Style—advice at the much less hard-and-fast parts of readability and tone, together with sentence size and order, conciseness, simplification, interpreting point, jargon and clich?
The articles gathered during this publication are concerned about the problems of restrictiveness and learnability inside of generative grammar, in particular, inside of Chomsky's 'Extended normal Theory'. those concerns were critical to syntactic study for many years and they're much more principal now as effects on syntactic concept, on learnability, and on acquisition start to converge.
- Autolexical Theory (Mathematical Topics,)
- Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6 (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)
- Who's on Whose Spot? (Homophones)
- Thematic Structure in Syntax (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
- Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)
- Intensive Basic Latin: A Grammar and Workbook (Grammar Workbooks)
Additional info for Constructing Collectivity: "We" Across Languages and Contexts
I don’t know, 4 I haven’t seen it. Based on analyses of American English plays and comic strips, Myhill (1995) and Myhill and Smith (1995) proposed that the most frequent uses of should in interactive exchanges in their data were not to express obligation, but to frame cooperative suggestions, as illustrated in (10). 5 In their study of discourse functions of modals of obligation, Myhill and Smith (1995) and Myhill (1996) suggest that have to is more likely to be used when the obligation comes from an authority other than the speaker herself.
G. we [the speaker and her family] figured, our living room was so big, why not take advantage, and have them put new walls, (SBC0049). One unusual formal finding for Group 3 is that 40% of past tense utterances are inclusive tokens of we. Unlike typical past tense exclusive uses, Joanne Scheibman however, these utterances do not occur in conversational narratives. g. so did we decide we did or do not want potatoes? (SBC0003). The examination of collectivity types in this section suggests that the type of collectivity indexed by we (general, culturally conventional, relational/circumstantial) contributes to the formal and functional character of the inclusive and exclusive utterance types in which they occur.
1985. ), 343–365. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. , Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna and Paolino, Danae. 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. ). 2002. Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Fillmore, Charles J. 1997. ), 5–29. Stockholm: Scriptor. Ford, Cecilia E.